🤖 Google AI Taps Gmail & Photos — Google's "AI Mode" now uses Personal Intelligence to scan your Gmail and Photos for hyper-personalized answers. It can build itineraries based on your actual bookings or suggest shopping based on your style history—though Google insists it doesn't train its models on your raw private data.

🤖 Ireland to Legalize Police Spyware — Ireland is proposing a new law to explicitly allow police to use spyware to hack devices and bypass encryption. Officials argue 1993 regulations are obsolete against modern apps, though they promise strict judicial oversight to prevent the human rights abuses seen elsewhere in Europe.

🤖 Spotify's AI "Prompted Playlists" — Premium users in the US and Canada can now build playlists using detailed, conversational prompts. By analyzing your entire listening history and real-time cultural trends, the AI interprets complex requests, allowing users to effectively program the algorithm using natural language.

🤖 Under Armour Aware of Mega-Breach — Under Armour is investigating after 72 million customer records surfaced on a hacker forum. While the company claims payment systems were untouched and "sensitive" exposure is minimal, the Everest ransomware gang has already claimed responsibility for the massive theft.

📌 Recruiting Expert: Stop Applying Online — J.T. O’Donnell advises job seekers to abandon degrading online applications clogged by AI spam and ghost jobs. The superior strategy now is to execute a documentation streak—engaging daily with 20–40 target companies on LinkedIn to trigger algorithms and attract headhunters directly.

📌 Google Absorbs "Empathic AI" Talent — Google DeepMind has hired the CEO and engineers from Hume AI in a controversial acqui-hire licensing deal designed to bypass antitrust regulators. The goal is to supercharge Gemini with Hume's "empathic" technology, which analyzes vocal cues to detect real-time user emotions.

📌 AI Fakes Research at Top AI Conference — GPTZero discovered 100 hallucinated citations across 51 papers at NeurIPS, the most prestigious AI conference. The irony is sharp: if even the world's leading experts can't stop their own AI tools from fabricating data in peer-reviewed work, the gap is wider than we thought.

Today's opportunities are brought to you by RightSide.

Automation Tester (Insurance) | Full Time | Edison, NJ | Hybrid
Mobile Engineering Lead | Full Time | Atlanta, GA | Hybrid
Quality Operational Systems | Contract | Mississauga, ON | Hybrid
Oracle Technical Specialist | Contract | Rockville, MD | Hybrid
VP Data Center of Excellence | Full Time | QualiTest | Remote
Informix Database Administrator | Full Time | Baltimore, MD | Hybrid
Salesforce Administrator | Contract | Seattle, WA | In Person

AI tools are now part of everyday life — helping with writing, editing, brainstorming, and even research — but using them ethically is something every individual should think about seriously. One of the clearest ethical concerns today is academic integrity and plagiarism. Generative tools can sometimes produce text that unintentionally resembles existing work or replicates ideas without proper attribution, so users must be vigilant about checking and disclosing their use of AI to avoid plagiarism or misrepresentation of originality. Responsible AI use means clearly acknowledging when an AI tool contributed to ideas, phrasing, or structure — rather than passing those contributions off as entirely human work.

Closely linked to integrity is the principle of transparency and accountability. AI should not be treated as a surrogate author; humans must remain responsible for the work they publish or share, and they should verify factual accuracy rather than taking AI outputs at face value. This reflects a broader ethic of personal ownership of ideas — AI can help suggest or polish content, but you remain accountable for the final reasoning, arguments, and conclusions you present. By taking responsibility for verification and attribution, individuals preserve trust and credibility in their work.

Another important ethical dimension is not outsourcing your thinking to AI. Scholars examining AI use in academic contexts note that overreliance on generative tools can erode essential skills like critical thinking, source evaluation, and original composition when AI outputs are used uncritically or without reflection. Ethical engagement means using AI to augment your own thinking — for example, to generate ideas, organize drafts, or explore alternatives — while you remain the primary author of direction, judgment, and final decisions.

Finally, ethical AI use involves respecting the broader impact on others — including peers, audiences, and the communities affected by your work. Practices that conceal AI involvement, evade plagiarism checks, or ignore proper attribution can damage trust not just for you but for others in your field. By approaching AI as a partner rather than a substitute, and by upholding clarity, originality, and accountability, individuals can harness AI’s utility while maintaining ethical standards that protect both personal integrity and the quality of shared knowledge.

550

satellites (approx.) are currently parked in the "Graveyard Orbit," a specific disposal zone located roughly 22,400 miles away from Earth where old satellites are sent to drift forever without hitting active ones.

Know an AI enthusiast? Share the value. FORWARD this email!